The Guardian reported the following headline this week:
There’s a surprise.
It might be reasonable to assume that such surprise is genuine. After all, only last year Michael Gove, the Secretary of State for Education announced that:
In itself, the title of this news release from the Department for Education (DfE) reveals confused logic. Firstly, why do teachers need to set up new schools in order to continue their excellence? Secondly, if excellent teachers are leaving one school to set up a new school, what happens to the excellence in the school they have left? Thirdly, how does this then improve standards for all pupils, rather than those fortunate enough to find themselves in new schools with excellent teachers?
However, we are invited not to critically engage with the discourse employed in DfE news releases, but to accept it. Goves’ plan focused on addressing the gap in education attainment between children from deprived backgrounds, and those more wealthy. The Free Schools plan was designed to bridge this gap. The news release from the DfE went on to say:
“The new Free Schools will also be incentivised to concentrate on the poorest children”
By choosing not to impugn the recondite ideological shift to concern with social inequality, it would be reasonable to expect that the 24 Free Schools scheduled to open this month would be located in some of England’s most deprived neighbourhoods.
As the Guardian reports, they are not, are we really surprised?